Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 30;114(7):1065–1071. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8946

Table 6.

OR estimates (95% CIs) for area of residence and IgG test results for six ATSDR studies conducted 1991–1994.

Study area Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d Model 5e
Results below the reference range
 California
 Kentucky
 Massachusetts 0.38 (0.17–0.85) 0.38 (0.17–0.86) 0.40 (0.17–0.94) 0.44 (0.18–1.06) 0.43 (0.18–1.01)
 Nebraska 1.53 (0.54–4.34) 1.43 (0.49–4.21) 1.35 (0.44–4.17) 1.31 (0.42–4.13) 1.68 (0.58–4.85)
 North Carolina
 Texas 1.22 (0.38–3.89) 1.83 (0.41–8.08) 1.79 (0.38–8.53) 1.68 (0.27–10.44) 1.03 (0.28–3.80)
Results above the reference range
 California 0.46 (0.21–1.03) 0.38 (0.16–2.13) 0.38 (0.15–0.96) 0.35 (0.14–0.90) 0.39 (0.16–0.94)
 Kentucky 2.60 (0.81–8.38) 2.38 (0.70–8.06) 2.39 (0.70–8.16) 2.57 (0.73–9.07) 2.51 (0.78–8.11)
 Massachusetts 1.21 (0.46–3.15) 0.92 (0.34–2.50) 0.72 (0.25–2.05) 0.74 (0.25–2.14) 0.90 (0.33–2.44)
 Nebraska 1.22 (0.37–4.05) 1.26 (0.33–4.90) 1.36 (0.34–5.50) 1.02 (0.24–4.30) 1.38 (0.41–4.66)
 North Carolina
 Texas 1.63 (0.85–3.10) 1.52 (0.72–3.20) 1.60 (0.75–3.41) 1.52 (0.66–3.49) 1.58 (0.82–3.04)

, OR estimates could not be calculated.

a

Model 1: unadjusted.

b

Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race, Hispanic ethnicity, educational level, years in residence.

c

Model 3: adjusted for the model 2 covariates and other exposure information.

d

Model 4: adjusted for the model 3 covariates, symptoms, illnesses, and overall health.

e

Model 5: adjusted using the backward elimination strategy of Kleinbaum (1994).