Table 1.
Would more or better testing have produced a more effective intervention? | ||||
Was the intervention tested?1 | Yes | No | Unclear | Totals |
Yes – extensively | 4 | 11 | 1 | 16 |
Yes – to some degree | 5 | 11 | 2 | 18 |
No | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
Totals | 13 | 26 | 3 | 42 |
Was the test phase mentioned in the published article?2 | ||||
Was the intervention tested?1 | Yes | No | Totals | |
Yes – extensively | 10 | 6 | 16 | |
Yes – to some degree | 7 | 11 | 18 | |
No | - | 8 | 8 | |
Totals | 17 | 25 | 42 |
1 Testing was categorised (by ST) as 'extensive' if the respondent considered the study a pilot, or mentioned substantial experience with similar interventions, tests of the complete intervention package running for several months, previously published pilot work, exploratory trials or the respondent described testing as extensive. All other testing was categorised as 'to some degree'.
2 Done by checking the text of the respondent's 2004 publication identified by our search.