Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2006 Mar 31;44(11):2037–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006

Table 3.

T values for planned comparisons between trial blocks within the Dots test

Percentage of correct responses Response speed Anticipatory responses
All subjects (d.f. = 313)
 Congruent vs. Incongruent blocks 13.78 14.46 7.46
 Congruent vs. Mixed blocks 28.55 24.49 14.58
 Incongruent vs. Mixed blocks 18.81 15.66 10.51
Younger subjects (4–6 years old; d.f. = 89)
 Congruent vs. Incongruent blocks 7.1 7.12 4.49
 Congruent vs. Mixed blocks 15.32 10.51 8.27
 Incongruent vs. Mixed blocks 8.83 5.99 4.82
Older subjects (6–26 years old; d.f. = 223)
 Congruent vs. Incongruent blocks 12.24 17.06 6.24
 Congruent vs. Mixed blocks 24.15 30.36 12.1
 Incongruent vs. Mixed blocks 16.91 18.74 9.43

All significant at p < 0.0001.