Table 1.
Sample | τdecay,* ns | (Å)† | σ (Å)† |
---|---|---|---|
No heat or NCp15 | |||
tRNA-FL | 4.3 | — | — |
TMR–tRNA–FL | 0.3 (85)‡ | 32 | 6 |
tRNA–FL/T | 4.2 | — | — |
TMR–tRNA–FL/T | 0.4 (74)‡ | 34 | 7 |
Heat-annealed | |||
tRNA–FL/T | 4.3 (76)§ | — | — |
TMR–tRNA–FL/T | 3.9 (70)§ | 73 | — |
NCp15-annealed | |||
tRNA–FL | 4.3 (68)¶ | — | — |
TMR–tRNA–FL | 0.4 (77)‡ | 35 | 5 |
tRNA–FL/T | 4.3 (68)§ | — | — |
TMR–tRNA–FL/T | 3.9 (52)§ | 73 | — |
Values are averages of at least five determinations. Numbers in parentheses represent typical amplitudes (percent total signal) with SD ≤ 8%.
Based on a Gaussian distribution [g(R)] analysis, where is the mean donor–acceptor distance and σ is the SD of g(R). SD ≤ 3 Å for and ≤2 Å for σ.
Mean donor lifetimes (SD ≤ 36%) from the Gaussian distribution analysis. A minor component (τD ∼ 4.3 ns), which may be the result of FL’s inability to undergo efficient FRET because of misfolded tRNA, was subtracted from the raw data before fitting was performed.
Based on a bi-exponential fit (SD ≤ 5%). A second component (τ ∼ 1.2 ns) can be resolved from these data.
Based on a single measurement.