Skip to main content
. 2003 Feb;47(2):518–523. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.518-523.2003

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

(A) Growth of the controls in the kinetic model. The mean ± the standard deviation is shown. (B) Effect of benzylpenicillin on PSP (T>MIC = 46%), PIP (T>MIC = 6%), and PRP (T>MIC = 0%). (C) Effect of benzylpenicillin on PSP (T>MIC = 75%), PIP (T>MIC = 38%), and PRP (T>MIC = 0%). (D) Effect of benzylpenicillin on PSP (T>MIC = 100%), PIP (T>MIC = 54%), and PRP (T>MIC = 0%). (E) Effect of benzylpenicillin on PSP (T>MIC = 100%), PIP (T>MIC = 83%), and PRP (T>MIC = 7%). (F) Effect of benzylpenicillin on PSP (T>MIC = 100%), PIP (T>MIC = 100%), and PRP (T>MIC = 48%).