Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 7;100(6):3363–3368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0230353100

Table 1.

Comparisons of sequence identity, and synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions

Species Nt (%) AA (%) Ks Ka
TART Gag
mel/vir 26 (37) 13 (18) 1.79  ± 0.36 1.09  ± 0.2
TART Pol
mel/vir 45 (52) 36 (45) 1.8  ± 0.64 0.57  ± 0.17
mel/ame 44 (50) 34 (38) 1.65  ± 0.37 0.61  ± 0.03
 vir/ame 57 54 1.5  ± 0.19 0.37  ± 0.02
R1 Pol
mel/hyd 60 59 1.3  ± 0.16 0.32  ± 0.03
Adh
mel/vir 75 79 1.04  ± 0.25 0.12  ± 0.03

Nt, % nucleotide identity; AA, % amino acid identity. Values in parentheses are calculated omitting residues in gapped regions. Ks, synonymous substitutions; Ka, replacement substitutions (±SE). Species are indicated by their first three letters. All pairwise sequence alignments were performed with clustalw (11), refined in gendoc (12), and analyzed with mega 2.1; genetic distance is based on Kumar et al. (13). Separation of D. melanogaster and Drosophila hydei is approximately equal to the separation of D. melanogaster and D. virilis. R1mel, X51968; R1hyd, U23196; Adhmel, X98338; Adhvir, AB033640.1. When TARTmel Pol is compared to longer Pol proteins, the extra domain of TARTvir and TARTame is not included in the calculations. 

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure