Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 6;100(6):3491–3496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437991100

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Schematic representation of presynaptic terminal at the α1A −/− NMJ. (A) Calcium dependence of neurotransmission in −/− NMJ. Overall changes include a sharp drop in quantal content at [Ca2+]o/[Mg2+]o = 2, but little loss of quantal content at [Ca2+]o/[Mg2+]o < 0.2. This can be described as a uniform scaling down of m at all [Ca2+]o (downward arrow), yielding the red curve, in combination with an increased sensitivity to [Ca2+]o/[Mg2+]o (leftward arrow). (B) Hypothetical positioning of Ca2+ and IK(Ca) channels relative to other active zone structures. (Upper) WT NMJ based on description of active zone structures in frog NMJ (20), with modifications appropriate to mammalian terminals, where vesicular fusion occurs in the central zone between double rows of membrane particles (68, 69). Positioning of IK(Ca) channels and P/Q-type channels (purple). (Lower) −/− NMJ is hypothesized to contain R-type channels (red) in at least partial substitution for P/Q-type channels (yellow), and N-type channels (blue), which are numerous, albeit farther away from Ca2+ sensors and vesicle release machinery. (C) Microdomains of Ca2+ near Ca2+ channels in the WT presynaptic terminal (Top), in −/− NMJ (Middle) and in −/− NMJ in the presence of Ca2+ chelators (Bottom). GVIA responsiveness is lost because the impact of Ca2+ entry through relatively distant N-type channels is blunted by exogenous cytoplasmic Ca2+ buffering.