Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2006;15(2):174–179. doi: 10.1080/10550490500528639

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the alcohol screen positive and negative groups

At enrollment Alcohol screen positive brief intervention (n = 10) Control (n = 13) Alcohol screen negative (n = 28)
DSM-IV lifetime alcohol Dx, % 10.0 15.4 7.1
Stage of change
 Action, % 40.0 46.2 35.7
 Contemplation, % 20.0 15.4 0.0
 Pre-contemplation, % 40.0 38.5 64.3
Alcohol consumption, mean drinks/drinking day*
 Enrollment 2.1 (.7) 2.3 (2.0) 1.3 (.7)
 Follow-up 2.0(1.5) 2.2 (.8) 1.3 (.7)
 Change 0.1 (1.0) 0.1 (1.6) 0(.6)
Mean percentage drinking days
 Enrollment 53.2 (29.7) 63.8 (59.4) 30.3 (37.2)
 Follow-up 13.4(9.6) 19.1 (20.3) 7.0 (11.5)§
 Change 39.8 (24.3) 44.7 (44.5) 23.3 (30.2)
Recollection of physician discussion, %
 Alcohol, enrollment 30.0 53.9 32.0
 Follow-up 40.0 23.1 32.1
 Caffeine, enrollment 20.0 38.5 32.0
 Follow-up 20.0 38.5 35.7
 Cigarettes, enrollment 40.0 33.3 28.0
 Follow-up 30.0 15.4 25.0
*

Drinks per drinking day at enrollment is based on a sample of 47, and drinks per drinking day at follow-up is based on a sample of 44.

Sample sizes for recollection data are 48.

p < .05, intergroup comparison. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for enrollment and follow-up data.

§

p < .01, intergroup comparison. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for enrollment and follow-up data.

p < .001, intragroup comparison. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate change.