Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan;69(1):290–296. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.290-296.2003

TABLE 4.

Results of the collaborative study validating the reproducibility of the analytical accuracy using primer set 139-141

Laboratory no. Inclusivity (%) Exclusivity (%) Positive predictivity (%) Negative predictivity (%) Analytical accuracy (%) Kappa indexa
1 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
2 94 100 100 92 96 0.926
3 96 97 98 94 96 0.927
4 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
4 98 92 94 97 95 0.903
6b 94 67 65 94 77 0.561
7 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
8 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
9 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
10 91 100 100 88 95 0.889
11 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
12 96 100 100 94 98 0.951
13 94 92 94 92 93 0.854
14 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
15 87 100 100 81 92 0.826
16 100 100 100 100 100 1.000
All 97 96 97 96 96 0.926
All but laboratory 6 97 99 99 96 98 0.952
a

Kappa values of <0.01 indicate no concordance, 0.1 to 0.4 indicate weak concordance, 0.41 to 0.60 indicate clear concordance, 0.61 to 0.80 indicate strong concordance, and 0.81 to 1.00 indicate nearly complete concordance.

b

Laboratory 6 was excluded from the final statistical analysis due to a markedly lower Kappa index compared with those of the other laboratories.