Table 5.
The number of ESTs, contigs and clusters differently expressed in L2 direct and L2 indirect stages and those with a two-fold or greater difference in expression.
| L2 direct-up | L2 indirect-up | Total | |
| EST 1 | 246 | 429 | 675 |
| ≥ 2-fold 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Contig 3 | 105 | 320 | 425 |
| ≥ 2-fold 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Cluster 3 | 93 | 311 | 404 |
| ≥ 2-fold 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
1These ESTs are represented by 107 and 95 (L2 direct-up) and 323 and 316 (L2 indirect-up) contigs and clusters respectively.
2Number of ESTs that have a ratio of expression that is ≥ 2; these ESTs are represented by 1 (L2 direct-up) and 3 (L2 indirect-up) contigs and clusters respectively.
3Number of contigs or clusters, respectively, in which at least one EST member (for which there were data above the quality threshold) had a significantly different ratio of expression.
4Number of contigs or clusters, respectively, in which at least one EST member (for which there were data above the quality threshold) has a significantly different ratio of expression that is ≥ 2.