TABLE 2.

Estimated copy numbers of Ogre sequences per haploid genomes (1C) of selected Vicia species and P. sativum

		1C(Mbp)	1C(pg)	Dot-blot probes				Other estimates	% in the genomed
Section	Species			LTR	ORF1	ORF2	ORF3
Hypechusa	V. pannonica	6,615	6.75	1–5 × 105	1 × 105	1 × 105	1 × 105	1 × 105 a	38
V. hybrida	6,640	6.78	1 × 105	1 × 104	1 × 104	1–5 × 104	—	4
V. lutea	7,252	7.40	0.5–1 × 104	0.5–1 × 103	5 × 102	1–5 × 103	—	0.2
V. melanops	9,800	10.00	5 × 105	1 × 105	1 × 105	1 × 105	1 × 105 b	26 (26)b
Cracca	V. villosa	2,230	2.28	5 × 103	0.5–1 × 103	1 × 103	5 × 103	—	1
Attosa	V. sepium	4,582	4.68	1 × 104	1 × 103	5 × 103	1–5 × 104	—	3
Vicia	V. sativa	2,205	2.25	5 × 103	1–5 × 103	1–5 × 103	1–5 × 104	1 × 104 b	6 (12)b
V. grandiflora	3,283	3.35	0.5–1 × 104	1 × 103	5 × 103	1–5 × 104	—	4
Wiggersia	V. lathyroides	2,573	2.63	1 × 102	0–50	0.5–1 × 102	5 × 103	—	0.1
Narbonensis	V. narbonensis	7,130	7.28	1–5 × 103	1 × 103	1–5 × 103	1–5 × 104	—	2
Faba	V. faba	13,255	13.50	1 × 103	0.5–1 × 102	1–5 × 102	1–5 × 104	—	0.1
Peregrina	V. peregrina	9,286	9.48	1–5 × 103	1–5 × 102	1 × 103	1–5 × 104	—	0.3
V. michauxii	8,134	8.30	1 × 103	1 × 102	1 × 103	1 × 104	—	0.3
	P. sativum	4,337	4.43	1–5 × 102	5 × 102	1–5 × 103	1–5 × 104	1 × 104 c	3 (6)c

^aBased on the number of positively hybridizing clones in the V. pannonica library.

^bAccording to Nouzová et al. (2001).

^cAccording to Neumann et al. (2003).

^dCalculations were based on estimated copy numbers of the ORF2 probe. Values in parentheses show genome proportions calculated using estimates obtained with other species-specific Ogre probes (as shown in the column “Other estimates”).