TABLE 3.
Alignment of chromosome 1D contigs to the RH map
| Contig name | Markers used for alignment | Coretention frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ctg605 | cdo57-0.90–cdo92-0.30 | 97.7 |
| ctg3467 | BE500570-0.35–BE443071-0.80 | 86.2 |
| ctg5162 | BF293779-0.39–bcd808-0.50 | 89.7 |
| ctg8420 | BE423482-0.15–BE403717-0.80 | 83.9 |
| ctg8420 | BE494877-0.39 | |
| ctg8420 | BE403553-0.03 | |
| ctg8420 | BE406901-0.20–BE423482-0.15 | 83.9 |
| ctg8420 | BE406901-0.20–BE494877-0.39 | 86.2 |
| ctg8420 | BE403553-0.03–BE403717-0.80 | 82.8 |
| ctg8420 | BE403717-0.80–BE403553-1.00 | 82.8 |
| ctg9212 | BF475048-0.07–BE443931-0.62 | 97.7 |
| ctg4625 | BE489565-1.60–BE490041-0.50 | 93.1 |
Markers used in the wheat RH mapping work in this study were used to identify wheat D-genome BAC contigs derived from the wheat D-genome physical mapping project (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/PhysicalMapping/index.html). In most cases, the left and right markers of a contig are given, as well as single markers that mapped to a particular contig. The ordering of these markers by using the comprehensive RH map (Figure 1) provides a method for the physical ordering of the contigs. The percentage of coretention frequency between two markers is calculated by subtracting the total number of breaks between those two markers from the total number of possible breaks (87) divided by the total number of possible breaks multiplied by 100.