TABLE 6.
HIS4–LEU2
|
LEU2–CEN3
|
CEN3–MAT
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strain(s)a | Relevant genotype | P | N | T | CMb | P | N | T | CMc | P | N | T | CMc |
PD83/MW103 | Wild type | 286 | 8 | 168 | 24 | 358 | 338 | 165 | 10 | 209 | 185 | 364 | 24 |
JSY240 | msh2Δ | 73 | 3 | 37 | 24 | 70 | 74 | 33 | 9 | 40 | 45 | 82 | 25 |
JSY163/JSY188 | msh3Δ | 104 | 4 | 81 | 28 | 157 | 162 | 78 | 10 | 91 | 95 | 168 | 24 |
JSY291/JSY285 | msh4Δ | 172 | 2 | 49 | 14d | 129 | 113 | 47 | 8 | 107 | 112 | 88 | 14e |
JSY297/JSY296 | msh5Δ | 141 | 0 | 31 | 9d | 112 | 106 | 40 | 8 | 106 | 99 | 55 | 11e |
JSY164/JSY216 | msh6Δ | 120 | 3 | 87 | 25 | 132 | 161 | 78 | 11 | 70 | 82 | 154 | 25 |
JSY349 | msh2Δ msh4Δ | 90 | 1 | 17 | 11d | 81 | 83 | 33 | 8 | 76 | 71 | 40 | 11e |
HMY95/JSY230 | mlh1Δ | 220 | 3 | 77 | 16d | 261 | 258 | 125 | 10 | 142 | 155 | 121 | 14e |
JSY165/JSY210 | mlh2Δ | 155 | 5 | 87 | 24 | 138 | 168 | 61 | 8 | 97 | 108 | 162 | 22 |
JSY178/JSY216 | mlh3Δ | 133 | 4 | 81 | 24 | 168 | 155 | 50 | 7 | 148 | 123 | 140 | 17e |
HMY96/JSY233 | pms1Δ | 226 | 1 | 128 | 19 | 325 | 336 | 117 | 8 | 136 | 116 | 192 | 22 |
JSY277 | mlh1Δ pms1Δ | 210 | 0 | 70 | 13d | 159 | 147 | 62 | 8 | 127 | 102 | 108 | 16e |
JSY292 | mlh1Δ mlh2Δ | 99 | 0 | 25 | 10d | 60 | 75 | 33 | 10 | 53 | 75 | 46 | 13e |
JSY283 | mlh1Δ mlh3Δ | 180 | 3 | 74 | 18 | 130 | 163 | 70 | 10 | 120 | 142 | 117 | 15e |
JSY136/JSY284 | exo1Δ | 223 | 2 | 69 | 14d | 170 | 166 | 30 | 4f | 132 | 139 | 84 | 12e |
JSY314/JSY313 | pol3-01 | 85 | 5 | 43 | 27 | 55 | 63 | 38 | 12 | 35 | 43 | 77 | 25 |
JSY255 | rad1Δ | 82 | 7 | 56 | 34 | 85 | 91 | 23 | 6 | 74 | 46 | 79 | 20 |
JSY239 | rad27Δ | 127 | 2 | 54 | 18 | 96 | 93 | 39 | 9 | 36 | 36 | 77 | 26 |
JSY320 | bas1Δ | 163 | 1 | 63 | 15 | 93 | 95 | 54 | 11 | 67 | 75 | 110 | 22 |
JSY321 | bas1Δ msh2Δ | 108 | 1 | 45 | 17 | 77 | 78 | 41 | 11 | 55 | 47 | 86 | 23 |
JSY338 | his4-51 | 195 | 5 | 65 | 18d | 130 | 109 | 53 | 9 | 101 | 69 | 135 | 22 |
JSY343 | his4-51 msh2Δ | 184 | 11 | 102 | 29 | 131 | 100 | 74 | 12 | 78 | 70 | 151 | 25 |
P, N, and T indicate parental ditype (PD), nonparental ditype (NPD), and tetratype tetrads (T), respectively. We included only those tetrads in which both flanking markers had Mendelian segregation.
For some intervals, data from multiple strains were pooled. These strains were isogenic, except for the specific mutations at the HIS4 locus.
Calculated by the equations of Perkins (1949).
Calculated as the percentage of second-division segregation (tetratype tetrads) divided by two. First-division segregation (FDS) and second-division segregation (SDS) tetrads were determined using the heterozygous centromere-linked trp1 marker.
Significant difference compared to the wild-type strain (PD83) in the numbers of PD:NPD:T tetrads. The P-values were determined using chi-square analysis. The P-values for each of the 21 comparisons were ranked and the Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) procedure was applied using an initial α = 0.05. P-values <0.019 were considered significant.
Significant difference compared to the wild-type strain (PD83) in the numbers of FDS:SDS tetrads for the CEN3–MAT interval. The P-values were determined using two-tailed Fisher exact tests. The P-values for 21 comparisons were ranked and the Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) procedure was applied using an initial α = 0.05. P-values <0.021 were considered significant.
Significant difference compared to the wild-type strain (PD83) in the numbers of FDS:SDS tetrads for the LEU2–CEN3 interval. The P-values were determined using two-tailed Fisher exact tests. The P-values for 21 comparisons were ranked and the Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) procedure was applied using an initial α = 0.05. P-values <0.002 were considered significant.