Table 1. Linear regression parameters for the model in equation 3 for the PM data.
PM | Intercept | γA | γC | γG | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln a | 6.617 ± 0.167 | 0.008 ± 0.014 | 0.219 ± 0.014 | 0.195 ± 0.013 | 0.56 |
ln b | 0.768 ± 0.324 | 0.154 ± 0.022 | 0.206 ± 0.028 | 0.377 ± 0.026 | 0.44 |
ln d | 2.533 ± 0.416 | –0.305 ± 0.028 | 0.354 ± 0.035 | 0.168 ± 0.033 | 0.48 |
Most parameters have small standard errors compared to their values, indicating that the fits truly capture sequence specificity. Probabilities p(γ = 0) < 10–6 under the hypothesis of no sequence-specificity, except for γaA. Probes were excluded from the fit according to the following criteria: (i) (a, b, d) had to be strictly positive because of the logarithms; (ii) an upper limit on b < 10 000 excluded probes in which no saturation effects were observed and hence a and b could not be determined independently; (iii) d < a / 5 excluded probes that were probably subject to significant cross-hybridization; and (iv) the calibration curves had to follow good Langmuir isotherms: the correlation coefficient ρ(ln Iobs, ln Ifit) between the observed and fitted intensities had to be >0.99. In total, this procedure removed 29.7% of the probes.