Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 12;100(7):3820–3825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0536703100

Table 3.

Summary of pMMO EXAFS fitting analysis

Fit no.
1
2
3
4
C.N. R, Å σ2, Å2* C.N. R, Å σ2, Å2* C.N. R, Å σ2, Å2* C.N. R, Å σ2, Å2*
Cu–N/O 2.5 1.97 3.17 2.5 1.97 3.02 2.5 1.97 2.82 2.5 1.97 3.70
Cu–C 1.0 2.60 1.70
Cu–S 1 2.71 3.13
Cu–Cu 0.5 2.57 3.73
F 271 69 59.6 40.7

R, best-fit bond lengths; C.N., coordination numbers. The best fit is shown in bold. 

*

Debye-Waller factor × 103

Degrees of freedom weighted mean square deviation between data and fit ×102