Table 3.
Summary of pMMO EXAFS fitting analysis
| Fit no.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||||||||
| C.N. | R, Å | σ2, Å2* | C.N. | R, Å | σ2, Å2* | C.N. | R, Å | σ2, Å2* | C.N. | R, Å | σ2, Å2* | |
| Cu–N/O | 2.5 | 1.97 | 3.17 | 2.5 | 1.97 | 3.02 | 2.5 | 1.97 | 2.82 | 2.5 | 1.97 | 3.70 |
| Cu–C | 1.0 | 2.60 | 1.70 | |||||||||
| Cu–S | 1 | 2.71 | 3.13 | |||||||||
| Cu–Cu | 0.5 | 2.57 | 3.73 | |||||||||
| F† | 271 | 69 | 59.6 | 40.7 | ||||||||
R, best-fit bond lengths; C.N., coordination numbers. The best fit is shown in bold.
Debye-Waller factor × 103.
Degrees of freedom weighted mean square deviation between data and fit ×102.