TABLE 4.
Antibody function after PPV in older adults
Study | Subjects | Controls | Endpoint | Measurements after PPV | Result of functional anti-CP antibody in older adults after PPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Musher et al. (85) | n = 5, men mean age, 69 yr; COPD | Healthy young men; mean age, 34 yr | OPA to 9 serotypes | 1 mo | OPA increased for 8/9 types from prevaccine (P ≤ 0.01); OPA increased less for 4/9 types compared to controls (P ≤ 0.02) |
Konradsen (64) | n = 15; mean age, 63 yr; Denmark | Control serum of younger subjects | Avidity for 2 serotypes | 1 mo, 5 yr | Avidity same relative to controls; unchanged after 5 yr |
Rubins et al. (124) | n = 53; men mean age, 71 yr; veterans | 28 younger staff members | Avidity and OPA to 1 serotype | 1 mo, 3 mo, 16 mo | OPA increased, but avidity did not, relative to prevaccine; subset of older subjects with poor antibody response also had poor OPA |
Romero-Steiner et al. (121) | n = 46; 39 women; mean age, 86 yr; nursing home residents | n = 12; mean age, 37 yr | OPA to 5 serotypes; avidity for select samples; passive protection | 2-3 wk | OPA less for 4/5 types compared to control prevaccine (P < 0.05); OPA less for 5/5 types postvaccine (P < 0.05); low avidity in samples with adequate antibody but low OPA; low avidity and OPA correlated with poor passive protection in mice |
Carson et al. (26) | n = 29; 13 female; mean age, 80 yr; veterans | Young, healthy | Avidity for 2 serotypes | 4 wk | Avidity increased for 1/2 types; no difference compared to young |