Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr;16(2):308–318. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.308-318.2003

TABLE 4.

Antibody function after PPV in older adults

Study Subjects Controls Endpoint Measurements after PPV Result of functional anti-CP antibody in older adults after PPV
Musher et al. (85) n = 5, men mean age, 69 yr; COPD Healthy young men; mean age, 34 yr OPA to 9 serotypes 1 mo OPA increased for 8/9 types from prevaccine (P ≤ 0.01); OPA increased less for 4/9 types compared to controls (P ≤ 0.02)
Konradsen (64) n = 15; mean age, 63 yr; Denmark Control serum of younger subjects Avidity for 2 serotypes 1 mo, 5 yr Avidity same relative to controls; unchanged after 5 yr
Rubins et al. (124) n = 53; men mean age, 71 yr; veterans 28 younger staff members Avidity and OPA to 1 serotype 1 mo, 3 mo, 16 mo OPA increased, but avidity did not, relative to prevaccine; subset of older subjects with poor antibody response also had poor OPA
Romero-Steiner et al. (121) n = 46; 39 women; mean age, 86 yr; nursing home residents n = 12; mean age, 37 yr OPA to 5 serotypes; avidity for select samples; passive protection 2-3 wk OPA less for 4/5 types compared to control prevaccine (P < 0.05); OPA less for 5/5 types postvaccine (P < 0.05); low avidity in samples with adequate antibody but low OPA; low avidity and OPA correlated with poor passive protection in mice
Carson et al. (26) n = 29; 13 female; mean age, 80 yr; veterans Young, healthy Avidity for 2 serotypes 4 wk Avidity increased for 1/2 types; no difference compared to young