Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug;99(8):406–414. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.8.406

Box 1.

Covariates used to predict high impact user status in descending order of importance in explaining the variation

Covariate Comments
Number of emergencies in 365 days before index spell Modelled as a continuous variable
Number of emergencies between 366 days and 36 months before index spell Modelled as a continuous variable
Charlson index of comorbidity Was devised originally to predict death. Capped at an upper limit of 6 (few patients had scores above this)
Age Five-year age bands up to 90+
Ambulatory care sensitive condition Conditions considered most amenable to case management. 19 groups as per Table 1, plus a `group 0' for all other conditions
Ethnicity Six groups: white, black, Indian sub-continent, Chinese, `unknown' and `other'
Standardized admission ratio (SAR) (log-transformed) SAR adjusted for age and sex for all emergencies for the ward of residence for 2000/2001 to 2002/2003 combined
Area-level lifestyle group Postcodes were allocated to one of 61 groups based on various lifestyle factors using the MOSAIC classification
Source of admission Home, nursing home, other hospital, etc.
Area-level deprivation 2004 Index of Multiple Deprivation for the patient's area of residence, divided into fifths
Number of consultant episodes in index spell Modelled as a continuous variable
Sex Male or female