Table 6.

Comparison of OMiMa PVLMM and MEM for donor site prediction. Comparing OMiMa with PVLMM and MEM for donor splice site prediction. The table shows Matthews correlation efficients (Mc) of top 4 models from each model class. The splice site data and results of MEM models were from Yeo and Burge [23]. In the 3-fold cross validation, the sample sizes for both training and testing sets are approximately equal to those of the original partition by Yeo and Burge.

MEM		PVLMM		OMiMa
sub-model	Mc	sub-model	Mc (Org./3-CV)	sub-model	Mc (Org./3-CV)
me2x5	0.659	P:2-2	0.629/0.631	3-C-1	0.658/0.663
me2x4	0.655	P:3-2	0.626/0.632	3-L-1	0.654/0.657
me2x3	0.653	P:4-2	0.625/0.630	2-C-1	0.647/0.657
me5s0	0.653	P:4-3	0.622/0.628	2-L-1	0.643/0.653