Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 24;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-8

Table 4.

Examples of how barriers to changing professionals' behaviour or guideline adherence can be classified

Revising Cabana et al.'s [12] system, Espeland and Baerheim [current study] related barriers to* Oxman and Flottorp [22] related barriers to Thompson et al. [24] related barriers to Grol [21] related barriers to Mäkelä and Thorsen [23] related barriers to
Knowledge Knowledge and attitudes Information management Individual clinician Professionals
Lack of knowledge of the guideline Clinical uncertainty Clinical uncertainty Knowledge Knowledge
Attitudes/feelings Sense of competence Sense of competence Skills Skills
Lack of agreement with its decision criteria Compulsion to act Standards of practice Attitudes Attitudes
Lack of outcome expectancy Information overload Financial disincentives Habits Patients
Lack of process expectancy Prevailing opinion Administrative issues Social context Knowledge
Lack of feelings expectancy Standards of practice Perception of liability Patients Skills
Lack of self-efficacy Opinion leaders Patient expectations Colleagues Attitudes
Lack of motivation/inertia of previous practice Medical training Authorities Other resources
External barriers related to Advocacy Organisational context Environment
Guideline (e.g., guideline unclear) Practice environment Available resources Social factors
Patient (e.g., patient pressure) Financial disincentives Organisational climate Organisational factors
Setting Organisational constraints Structures, etc. Economic factors
- lack of time Perception of liability
- lack of other practice resources Patient expectations
- increased costs
- increased malpractice liability
- pressures in the health care system
- improper access to health care services

* Possible strengths and weaknesses of this revised system: • Specifically concerns physicians' adherence to clinical practice guidelines [12] • Includes barriers actually reported by physicians in published studies [12] • Specifies several different types of attitude/feeling-related barriers • Separates these 'internal' barriers related to the physician from external barriers • Can be used to examine the relationship between internal and external barriers [40] • Includes lack of process expectancy in addition to lack of outcome expectancy • Explicitly lists guideline-related barriers, which guideline developers can prevent • Incorporates specific aspects of physicians' uncertainty, not a broad category (see text) • Lists attitudes that may underlie a 'compulsion to act', e.g., lack of process expectancy • Does not seem to have been used to classify barriers perceived by non-physicians, as opposed to for example Oxman and Flottorp's system [22,41] • Does not explicitly list specific reasons for internal barriers that can be directly addressed • Only implicitly incorporates medical training, advocacy and opinion leaders as sources of barriers • Concerns only barriers and not facilitators, as opposed to Mäkelä and Thorsen's [23] system, although lack of a barrier can also be a facilitator