Skip to main content
. 1999 Feb 2;96(3):1157–1161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.1157

Table 1.

Morphological and dental features distinguishing Cercocebus and Mandrillus from Lophocebus and Papio

Index Cercocebus Mandrillus Lophocebus Papio P value
(Supinator crest height/humerus length) × 100 35.2  (1.6), 6 33.2  (0.85), 6 31    (3.34), 6 30.2  (2.68), 5 0.002
(Deltoid plane width/humeral head width) × 100 88.3 (6.7), 6 84   (10.7), 6 73.1  (8.13), 6 70.1  (9.8), 5 <0.001
(Coronoid width/articular notch width) × 100 54.9 (6.14), 6 55.6  (8.36), 6 71.9  (9.77), 4 70.7  (7.13), 5 <0.001
(Tibia mid AP diameter/mid ML diameter) × 100 132.3 (1.29), 6 123.5  (.964), 6 152.5  (0.77), 4 144.2  (4.32), 5 <0.001
(Scapula maximum height/maximum length) × 100 90.9 (8.22), 6 91.2  (3.67), 6 80.9  (3.49), 7 72.9  (4.32), 5 0.002
(Ilium minimum width/maximum acetabular diameter) × 100 111.8 (8.85), 5 117  (9.8), 5 86.2  (6.56), 4 100.6  (1.17), 6 <0.001
(P4 m-d × b-l/M1 m-d × b-l) × 100 90.3 (10.9), 10 95.3  (13.66), 12 57    (7.13), 13 61.1  (9.2), 6 <0.001
(P4 m-d × b-l/M1 m-d × b-l) × 100 85.6 (6.4), 10 86   (14.4), 12 57.6  (5.3), 13 55.5  (4.2), 6 <0.001

The means of Cercocebus and Mandrillus and those of Lophocebus and Papio were compared using the Games and Howell method and were not significantly different. Subsequently the combined means of Cercocebus–Mandrillus and Lophocebus–Papio were compared using Student’s t test. All measurements are of males. Values given as mean (SD), n. m-d = mesiodistal length, b-l = buccolingual breadth.