Table 1.
Interventions and process evaluation in eight studies of HIV prevention
| Outcome study | Additional process study | Intervention | Site | Any positive effects? | Methods of process evaluation | Stated rationale for process evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dilley et al (2002)8 | None | Cognitive behavioural HIV prevention counselling | San Francisco HIV clinic | Yes | Adherence to treatment. Some sessions taped but data not reported | Assess consistency, completeness, and adherence to intervention guidelines |
| Elford et al (2001)9 | Elford et al (2002),10 | HIV peer education | London gyms | No | Survey of men's awareness, contact with and perceived usefulness of work. | Explore feasibility, practical constraints, transferability, and cultural adaptation |
| Elford et al (2000)11 | Interviews and group discussions with providers and stakeholders and documents about costs, planning, and delivery | |||||
| Flowers et al (2002)12 | Flowers et al (1999)13 | HIV peer education, gay specific genitourinary medicine service, and telephone advice line | Gay venues and clinic, Glasgow | No (intention to treat); yes (treatment analysis) | Observation of intervention. Survey of men's awareness and contact with work and its acceptability. Provider diaries, interviews and group discussions, and documents about planning and delivery | None |
| Gold and Rosenthal (1998)14 | None | Face to face HIV prevention discussion versus posters | Homes, Melbourne and Sydney | No | Survey of men's views on usefulness of interventions | None |
| Imrie et al (2001)15 | None | Cognitive behavioural HIV prevention workshop | Sexual health clinic, London | No | None | None |
| Picciano et al (2001)16 | None | HIV telephone counselling | US | Yes | Counsellor reports of contents and ratings of each session | None |
| Rosser et al (2002)17 | None | HIV education seminars | US university | Yes | None | None |
| Shepherd et al (1997)18 | Shepherd et al (1999)19 | HIV peer education | UK homes and other informal sites | Yes | Group discussions and interviews with educators, including drop-outs, about intervention training, reach, acceptability, and delivery | To examine how peer education can be undertaken with gay men not yet involved in the gay community |