Skip to main content
editorial
. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):346–349. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7563.346

Table 1.

Interventions and process evaluation in eight studies of HIV prevention

Outcome study Additional process study Intervention Site Any positive effects? Methods of process evaluation Stated rationale for process evaluation
Dilley et al (2002)8 None Cognitive behavioural HIV prevention counselling San Francisco HIV clinic Yes Adherence to treatment. Some sessions taped but data not reported Assess consistency, completeness, and adherence to intervention guidelines
Elford et al (2001)9 Elford et al (2002),10 HIV peer education London gyms No Survey of men's awareness, contact with and perceived usefulness of work. Explore feasibility, practical constraints, transferability, and cultural adaptation
Elford et al (2000)11 Interviews and group discussions with providers and stakeholders and documents about costs, planning, and delivery
Flowers et al (2002)12 Flowers et al (1999)13 HIV peer education, gay specific genitourinary medicine service, and telephone advice line Gay venues and clinic, Glasgow No (intention to treat); yes (treatment analysis) Observation of intervention. Survey of men's awareness and contact with work and its acceptability. Provider diaries, interviews and group discussions, and documents about planning and delivery None
Gold and Rosenthal (1998)14 None Face to face HIV prevention discussion versus posters Homes, Melbourne and Sydney No Survey of men's views on usefulness of interventions None
Imrie et al (2001)15 None Cognitive behavioural HIV prevention workshop Sexual health clinic, London No None None
Picciano et al (2001)16 None HIV telephone counselling US Yes Counsellor reports of contents and ratings of each session None
Rosser et al (2002)17 None HIV education seminars US university Yes None None
Shepherd et al (1997)18 Shepherd et al (1999)19 HIV peer education UK homes and other informal sites Yes Group discussions and interviews with educators, including drop-outs, about intervention training, reach, acceptability, and delivery To examine how peer education can be undertaken with gay men not yet involved in the gay community