Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr;41(4):1480–1485. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1480-1485.2003

TABLE 2.

EIA performance with samples from the Japanese populationa

HM-CAP or HM-CAP antigen No. of samples with the following result:
% Indeterminate Sensitivity (%)b Specificity (%)b Accuracy (%)b
True positive True negative False positive False negative
197SR-US 192 58 0 21 5.9 90.1 (85.3-93.8) 100.0 (93.8-100) 92.3 (88.4-95.1)
8826A-US 213 56 0 11 2.8 95.1 (91.4-97.5) 100.0 (93.6-100) 96.1 (93.1-98.0)
159A, 1-J 220 54 2 8 1.4 96.5 (93.2-98.5) 96.4 (87.7-99.6) 96.5 (93.6-98.3)
159A, 2-J 213 57 0 11 2.4 95.1 (91.4-97.5) 100.0 (93.7-100) 96.1 (93.1-98.0)
193C-J 201 57 0 18 4.2 91.8 (87.3-95.1) 100.0 (93.7-100) 93.5 (89.9-96.1)
198C-J 219 54 3 5 2.4 97.8 (94.9-99.3) 94.7 (85.4-98.9) 97.2 (94.5-98.8)
225C-J 222 52 3 7 1.4 96.9 (93.8-98.8) 94.5 (84.9-98.9) 96.5 (93.6-98.3)
JHM-CAP pool 221 54 2 6 1.7 97.4 (94.3-99.0) 96.4 (87.7-99.6) 97.2 (94.5-98.8)
a

A total of 288 samples were tested.

b

The values for samples with indeterminate results were excluded from analysis. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.