Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):245–251. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.245

Table 3.

Standardized path coefficients and fit statistics

Predictors
Subject’s demographics
Healthy Pregnancy Facts score
White
Household income
Subject
Partner
Lagged dependent variablea
Variable β r β r β r β r β r
Standardized path coefficients
 Health Pregnancy Facts score
  Subject .091 .1611* .1338* .1944* .1281* .1703*
  Partner .1469* .1837* .0846 .1501*
Lifetime alcohol use .0746 .1018 .0349 .0894
Drinking, prior to pregnancy
 Drinks per day .0315 .1389* −.0399 −.0449 .3415 .4753
 Percentage drinking days .1161 −.2226 −.0701 −.0148 .3412 .0689
Prenatal drinking, pre-enrollmentDrinks per day .0204 .0513 .1151* .1092 .5124 .5411
 Percentage drinking days −.0481 −.0563 .0897 −.0976 .5316 .4183
Prenatal drinking, after enrollment
 Drinks per day .1790 .1109 .1414* .0397 .4826
 Percentage drinking days .1295 .1027 −.1314 .1776 .2054*
Fit statistics
 Independence model chi-square (55 df) 1454.10
 Model chi-square (20 df) 66.97
 Goodness of Fit Index .9567
 RMSEA (95% CI) .0930 (.0685–.1185)
 Bentler and Bonett’s NFI .9539

Notes: RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; NFI = normed fit index.

a

The lagged dependent variable is drinking in the prior period.

*

p < .05;

p < .01;

p < .001.