Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 17;100(9):5142–5147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0930122100

Table 1.

Intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds as a function of conformational state and solvent environment

Simulation Number of hydrogen bonds
N TS D
Pure water
 60°C
  Water–protein 96 NA NA
  Protein–protein 53 NA NA
 125°C
  Water–protein 82 119 (6) 118 (6)
  Protein–protein 55 36 (2) 33 (3)
8 M urea, 60°C
 UR1
  Water–protein 70 102 (4) 108 (7)
  Urea–protein 30 32 (2) 41 (7)
  Protein–protein 49 26 (2) 25 (2)
 UR2
  Water–protein 70 94 (5) 103 (7)
  Urea–protein 30 37 (3) 40 (5)
  Protein–protein 48 30 (1) 26 (2)
 UR3
  Water–protein 74 109 (3) 110 (7)
  Urea–protein 22 43 (3) 52 (7)
  Protein–protein 52 24 (3) 23 (2)

Hydrogen bonds were considered to be intact when donor and acceptor atoms were within 2.6 Å and 35° of linearity. The N values are for t = 0 ns for each simulation. The TS values are averages over the following time intervals: UR1, 2.085–2.090 ns; UR2, 1.845–1.850 ns; UR3, 1.805–1.810 ns; and 125°C in pure water, 8.245–8.250 ns. The TS ensemble regions were identified by using a conformational clustering procedure described by Li and Daggett (23, 24). The D values are averages from 15–20 ns. SDs are given in parentheses. NA, not applicable.