Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 13;103(30):11240–11245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604351103

Table 1.

Hybrid data assembly

Organism Sequencing gaps Hard stop gaps Average sequence gap size Missing sequence Base pairs in 1× or 0× coverage Q20 BP in Scaff Percent Q20 in scaffold Physical gaps N50 contig Coverage Genome size Cost difference, %
MIT9211 5.3× 11 0 366 4,026 8,378 1,746,693 99.20 0 277,174 6 1,760,746 −37.00
MIT9211 5.3×–one 454 0 0 0 0 222 1,763,720 97.66 0 1,847,284 24 1,806,060 19.13
MIT9211 5.3×–two 454 0 0 0 0 133 1,765,790 97.65 0 1,688,962 42 1,808,271 52.00
MIT9211 two 454 only 9 0 394 3,546 1,499 1,707,409 99.62 0 427,124 36 1,713,978 6.55
MIT9211 8×–0 454 1 0 20 20 31 1,854,846 97.92 0 1,228,306 10 1,894,186 0.00
HTCC2594 5.3× 50 0 600 30,000 47,037 3,030,260 98.80 0 78,081 5 3,066,971 −26.00
HTCC2594 5.3×–one 454 11 0 746 8,206 5,161 3,048,942 99.61 0 265,562 15 3,060,803 9.42
HTCC2594 5.3×–two 454 0 0 0 0 1,273 3,053,801 99.93 0 3,053,801 34 3,055,839 24.28
HTCC2594 8×–one 454 1 0 156 156 386 3,053,178 99.98 0 1,655,186 18 3,053,827 26.50
HTCC2594 8×–two 454 0 0 0 0 150 3,053,677 100.00 0 3,053,801 37 3,053,801 36.60
HTCC2594 two 454 only 50 0 4,863 243,150 6,019 3,029,260 92.34 0 125,688 29 3,280,646 −14.00
HTCC2594 8×–0 454 4 0 158 632 4,817 3,051,930 99.93 0 865,987 9 3,054,012 0.00
HTCC2649 5.3× 156 28 646 100,776 60,499 4,165,998 97.37 0 44,457 5 4,278,365 −3.00
HTCC2649 5.3×–1 454 61 11 235 14,335 29,059 4,216,813 99.40 0 121,019 12 4,242,346 2.00
HTCC2649 5.3×–two 454 15 4 1,177 17,655 19,626 4,235,057 99.21 0 489,600 21 4,268,677 13.35
HTCC2649 8×–one 454 38 11 248 9,424 14,016 4,233,589 99.64 0 200,552 15 4,249,087 22.12
HTCC2649 8×–two 454 3 3 13 40 15,259 4,233,767 99.97 0 1,221,599 25 4,235,038 31.26
HTCC2649 two 454 only 114 20 6,757 770,298 12,073 4,117,973 83.57 1 54,348 16 4,927,326 −33.00
HTCC2649 8×–0 454 107 76 58 6,206 19,320 4,223,352 99.72 68,491 9 4,235,057 0.00
S14 5.3× 266 0 983 261,478 149,819 5,072,226 94.76 10 29,979 5 5,352,635 −24.00
S14 5.3×–one 454 120 0 1,278 153,360 54,485 4,965,321 96.50 11 61,684 10 5,145,225 4.61
S14 5.3×–two 454 30 0 4,500 135,000 15,594 5,044,842 97.20 5 351,723 17 5,190,011 17.97
S14 8×–one 454 26 0 2,878 74,828 15,130 5,027,642 98.39 6 313,097 12 5,109,753 22.11
S14 8×–two 454 18 0 4,000 72,000 8,493 5,095,940 98.35 5 404,679 21 5,181,460 31.25
S14 two 454 only 125 0 9,529 1,191,125 18,500 4,768,229 78.54 95 22,966 13 6,070,860 −33.00
S14 8×–0 454 59 0 1,979 116,761 57,071 5,047,120 98.94 6 139,234 8 5,101,447 0.00
CNPT3 5.3× 297 0 1,009 299,673 105,754 2,698,477 89.27 8 14,163 4 3,022,992 −18.00
CNPT3 5.3×–one 454 107 0 1,232 131,824 40,304 2,973,045 94.84 5 67,811 11 3,134,706 20.83
CNPT3 5.3×–two 454 12 0 3,400 40,800 8,884 3,038,758 97.62 0 286,979 23 3,112,910 34.73
CNPT3 8×–one 454 42 0 2,316 97,272 20,524 3,038,403 96.74 1 127,506 13 3,140,913 30.90
CNPT3 8×–two 454 12 0 3,387 40,644 9,610 3,070,512 98.38 0 286,979 24 3,121,209 41.73
CNPT3 two 454 only 88 0 2,977 261,976 7,480 2,918,009 90.91 18 44,842 19 3,209,644 5.72
CNPT3 8×–0 454 136 0 1,305 177,480 58,925 2,932,134 95.31 3 47,074 6 3,076,427 0.00
D2 5.3× 437 0 417 182,303 196,439 4,808,623 98.47 28 14,970 4 4,883,418 −42.00
D2 5.3×–one 454 254 0 380 96,523 118,977 4,895,192 99.05 27 26,468 8 4,942,189 −16.00
D2 5.3×–two 454 37 0 614 22,733 39,971 4,934,010 99.31 12 155,774 15 4,968,469 −1.00
D2 8×–one 454 16 0 1,161 18,570 40,346 4,944,178 99.46 12 269,204 13 4,971,208 20.56
D2 8×–two 454 5 0 2,430 12,148 28,912 4,975,666 99.62 10 660,254 20 4,994,573 29.29
D2 two 454 only 77 0 9,320 717,640 16,195 4,593,629 84.54 130 21,045 12 5,433,827 −62.94
D2 8×–0 454 23 0 986 22,685 42,629 4,921,016 98.77 14 253,418 9 4,982,425 0.00

Comparison of gaps (type and size), base pairs in low-coverage areas and high-quality areas, as well as coverage, N50 numbers, and cost differentials. The assembly quality score is a rough indication of assembly quality, with a higher number being an assembly of lower quality based on the equation in the table.