Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1983 Jan 15;286(6360):186–187. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6360.186

Therapeutic retraction of the foreskin in childhood.

G G Cooper, G J Thomson, P A Raine
PMCID: PMC1546344  PMID: 6401522

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted of 91 boys who had had a non-retractable but non-fibrosed prepuce treated by retraction under general anaesthesia. Of the 79 boys who had had symptoms, 67 (85%) obtained relief. Twelve of the 91 patients were later circumcised because of continuing problems. Retraction of the foreskin alone is a simple and effective alternative to circumcision in managing most boys with a symptomatic, non-retractable prepuce.

Full text

PDF
186

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. GAIRDNER D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7, illust. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gil Barbosa M., Aguilera González C., Alipaz A., García Sanchez J. L. La balanólisis como sustituto de la circuncisión. Salud Publica Mex. 1976 Sep-Oct;18(5):893–899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES