Skip to main content
. 2003 May;41(5):2164–2165. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2164-2165.2003

TABLE 1.

Subtype-specific frequency of amantadine-resistant H1N1 and H3N2 strains from posttreatment samples during the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 influenza seasons in Niigata City, Japan

Season H1N1 strains
H3N2 strains
Total by season (%)
No. of strains with amino acid substitution at:a
No. of total resistant strains/isolates (%) No. of strains with amino acid substitution ata:
No. of total resistant strains/isolates (%)
26 27 30 31 26 27 30 31
1999-2000 0 4 0 1 5/22 (22.7) 0 1 3 15 19/59 (32.7) 24/81 (29.6)
2000-2001 1 2 0 1 4/23 (17.4) 0 0 1 2 3/7 (42.9) 7/30 (23.3)
Total by subtype (%) 1 6b 0 2c 9/45 (20.0) 0 1b,d 4d 17c,d 22/66 (33.3) 31/111 (27.9)
a

Each number indicates the number of cases of amantadine-resistant influenza virus A strains with the respective amino acid substitutions in the transmembrane domain of the M2 protein.

b

The proprtion of amino acid substitutions at position 27 was significantly higher in H1N1 strains than in H3N2 strains (Yates corrected χ2 test, P < 0.01).

c

The proportion of amino acid substitutions at position 31 was significantly higher in H3N2 strains than in H1N1 strains (Yates corrected χ2 test, P < 0.05).

d

The proportion of amino acid substitutions at position 31 was significantly higher than at positions 27 and 30 within H3N2 strains (Yates corrected χ2 test, P < 0.001, respectively).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure