Skip to main content
. 2003 May;41(5):1912–1918. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.1912-1918.2003

TABLE 3.

Distribution of interpretive discrepancies and categorical error rates by antimicrobial agent tested

Antimicrobial agent No. of organism- antimicrobial combinations tested % of inter- pretative discrep- anciesa % of errors of type
Minora Majorb Very majorc
Piperacillin-tazobactam 809 21.2 13.9 9.1 7.7
Ceftriaxone 352 19.6 10.8 15.6 5.2
Cefotaxime 647 17.0 10.2 6.4 8.0
Ceftazidime 892 11.8 4.8 8.9 5.1
Cefepime 903 30.5 13.9 16.9 19.3
Aztreonam 848 22.1 13.9 13.6 6.6
Imipenem 919 2.4 1.6 0.6 1.9
Meropenem 829 6.6 3.6 3.0 0
Total 6,199 15.9d 8.8d 7.6 7.8
a

Considering the number of susceptibility testing determinations for each antibiotic as the denominator.

b

Considering the number of susceptible strains for each antibiotic as the denominator.

c

Considering the number of resistant strains for each antibiotic as the denominator.

d

Considering the total number of susceptibility testing determinations as the denominator.