Skip to main content
. 2005 May 24;7(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e14

Table 1.

Motivators and barriers experienced by the ASCM I development team

Motivator Description/Characteristics
Curriculum gap
  • Expressed need of faculty and students for contextually relevant, uniform curriculum available at all times across the university and its diverse affiliated hospitals

Team leadership
  • Vision to develop ASCM I website and improve the medical curriculum

  • Vocal project champion and advocate

  • Strong team recruitment and team building skills

  • Ability to capture funding

Medical students
  • Posses in-depth knowledge of curriculum content, student learning needs, and target audience perspective

  • Intelligent, altruistic, hard working, and cost-effective

Faculty
  • Investment of substantial personal and academic time

  • Altruism

  • Strong content and teaching expertise

  • Commitment to improving medical education

Teamwork
  • Team members with different motivations all united in their desire to improve the clinical curriculum

  • Strong grassroots and hands-on approach to resource development

Financial resources
  • Financial support from the U of T key to project initiation and completion

Space
  • Dedicated research and development space (Educational Innovation Lab)

Barrier
Administrative structure of
institution
  • Educational IT new, expensive, and not fully incorporated into the academic institution

  • Lack of centralized IT policy, support, and resources leading to redundancy and inefficiency

Development mandate
  • Lack of a faculty level champion able to assume site ownership and maintenance responsibility

Faculty
  • Little academic incentive for faculty to contribute to IT innovations (eg, no protected or paid time for clinicians to develop educational resources)

Support staff
  • Lack of support staff and expertise (eg, for user helpline, IT development and maintenance)

Equipment
  • Outdated equipment lacking user support