Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 7;10(2):R55. doi: 10.1186/cc4887

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis for primary outcomes comparing percutaneous dilatational and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients

Outcome Subgroup No. of studies Estimate of OR 95% CI Test for between subgroup heterogeneity
Infection Allocation concealment P = 0.65
Yes 4 0.33 0.14–0.77
No 7 0.24 0.11–0.53
Method of PDT P = 0.62
Multiple dilator 9 0.24 0.13–0.47
Forceps 1 0.15 0.01–3.74
Translaryngeal 1 0.55 0.15–2.1
ST performed P = 0.70
ICU 2 0.49 0.12–1.99
OT 9 0.25 0.13–0.47
Use of Bronchoscope for PDT P = 0.28
Yes 5 0.40 0.18–0.89
No 6 0.20 0.09–0.46
Bleeding Allocation concealment P = 0.67
Yes 5 0.85 0.46–1.41
No 5 0.71 0.26–1.94
Method of PDT P = 0.33
Multiple dilator 7 0.96 0.51–1.83
Forceps 1 1.7 0.15–20.17
Translaryngeal 1 0.08 0.004–1.37
Single dilator 1 1.5 0.06–39.24
ST performed P = 0.009
ICU 4 2.01 0.86–4.69
OT 6 0.29 0.12–0.75
Use of bronchoscope for PDT P = 0.08
Yes 5 1.36 0.65–2.84
No 5 0.34 0.12–0.92
Mortality Allocation concealment P = 0.86
Yes 5 0.81 0.54–1.22
No 7 0.77 0.50–1.19
Method of PDT P = 0.94
Multiple dilator 9 0.80 0.57–1.11
Forceps 2 0.63 0.16–2.45
Translaryngeal 1 0.84 0.40–1.79
ST performed P = 0.2
ICU 3 1.09 0.61–1.97
OT 9 0.79 0.50–1.00
Use of bronchoscope for PDT P = 0.52
Yes 6 0.86 0.58–1.28
No 6 0.71 0.45–1.12

ICU, intensive care unit; OT, operating theatre; PDT, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy; ST, surgical tracheostomy.