Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 31;7:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-33

Table 3.

Comparison of reliability coefficient for the overall sample and for each of the pairs of testers.

Variable Reliability coefficient

Overall sample (n = 30) Pair 1 (n = 20) Pair 2 (n = 10)
Hamstrings length (degrees) .92 .88 .98
Lateral retinacular length (tight, normal) .71 1.0 .55
Q-angle (degrees) .70 .56 .77
Tibial torsion (degrees) .70 .60 .83
Quadriceps length (degrees) .91 .90 .93
Femoral anteversion (degrees) .45 .31 .64
Gastrocnemius length (degrees) .92 .78 .97
Soleus length (degrees) .86 .85 .92
Hip external rotation strength (Kg) .79 .71 .97
Hip abduction strength (Kg) .85 .86 .59
ITB/TFL complex length (degrees) .97 .90 .99
Foot pronation (mm) .93 .89 .95
Quality of movement (from 0 to 1 = good; from 2 to 3 = medium; 4 and above = poor) .67 .62 .67