Skip to main content
. 2006 May 31;8(3):R25. doi: 10.1186/bcr1412

Table 3.

Relative risks associated with recurrence score among ER-positive patients, stratified by treatment with tamoxifen

Score Cases Controls RR1 (95% CI) P value
Tamoxifen treated (55 cases and 150 controls)
Recurrence Score
 Continuous2 55 (100%) 150 (100%) 7.6 (2.6–21.9) <0.0001
 Pre-specified categories
  Low risk (<18) 16 (29%) 95 (63%) 1.0 reference
  Intermediate risk (18–30) 22 (40%) 35 (23%) 4.0 (1.8–8.8)
  High risk (≥31) 17 (31%) 20 (13%) 6.2 (2.4–15.8)
 Quartiles3 0.0004
  1st (0–8.25) 5 (9%) 38 (25%) 1.0 reference
  2nd (8.26–14.43) 6 (11%) 37 (25%) 1.0 (0.3–3.7)
  3rd (14.44–20.95) 15 (27%) 38 (25%) 2.9 (1.0–8.9)
  4th (20.96–78.78) 53 (53%) 37 (25%) 5.8 (2.0–16.6)
Tamoxifen untreated (110 cases and 251 controls)
Recurrence Score
 Continuous2 110 (100%) 251 (100%) 4.1 (2.1–8.1) <0.0001
 Pre-specified categories <0.0001
  Low risk (<18) 40 (36%) 160 (64%) 1.0 reference
  Intermediate risk (18–30) 32 (29%) 47 (19%) 2.7 (1.5–5.0)
  High risk (≥31) 38 (35%) 44 (18%) 3.3 (1.8–5.9)
 Quartiles4 <0.0001
  1st (0–7.53) 11 (10%) 63 (25%) 1.0 reference
  2nd (7.54–14.25) 19 (17%) 64 (25%) 1.5 (0.7–3.4)
  3rd (14.26–21.86) 23 (28%) 62 (25%) 2.1 (0.9–4.9)
  4th (21.87–85.82) 57 (52%) 62 (25%) 5.3 (2.5-1.3)

1Conditional logistic regression models include Recurrence Score variables only. 2Relative risks for Recurrence Score calculated with regard to an increment of 50 units (chosen to be consistent with and comparable with previous studies). 3Quartiles based on distribution among controls treated with tamoxifen. 4Quartiles based on distribution among controls not treated with tamoxifen. CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; RR, relative risk.