TABLE 2.
Bacterium (no. of isolates tested) and antimicrobial agent | MIC (μg/ml)
|
No. (%) of isolates
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range | 50% | 90% | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant | |
M. fortuitum group (69) | ||||||
Amikacin | 1-16 | 1 | 8 | 69 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Tobramycina | 1-32 | 8 | 16 | 6 (9) | 31 (45) | 32 (46) |
Cefoxitin | 8->256 | 32 | 64 | 13 (19) | 55 (80) | 1 (1) |
Ciprofloxacin | 0.25-16 | 0.25 | 8 | 43 (62) | 3 (4) | 23 (33) |
Moxifloxacinc | 0.06-16 | 0.06 | 16 | 46 (67) | 6 (9) | 17 (25) |
Gatifloxacinc | 0.06-16 | 0.12 | 8 | 48 (70) | 7 (10) | 14 (20) |
Levofloxacinc | 0.06-64 | 0.25 | 32 | 44 (64) | 2 (3) | 23 (33) |
Clarithromycin | 0.12->64 | 2 | 8 | 45 (65) | 10 (15) | 14 (20) |
Azithromycinc | 1-64 | 8 | 64 | 16 (24) | 16 (24) | 37 (52) |
Telithromycinc | 0.06->64 | 64 | >64 | —f | — | — |
Doxycycline | 0.25->32 | 16 | >32 | 9 (13) | 13 (19) | 47 (68) |
Imipenem | 1-32 | 2 | 8 | 42 (61) | 22 (32) | 5 (7) |
Meropenemc | 1->64 | 4 | 32 | 35 (51) | 6 (9) | 28 (41) |
TMP-SMZd | 1->64 | 64 | >64 | 34 (49) | — | 35 (51) |
Linezolide | 0.12-64 | 8 | 32 | 47 (68) | 5 (7) | 17 (25) |
M. chelonae (39) | ||||||
Amikacin | 2-16 | 8 | 16 | 39 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Tobramycin | 1-16 | 8 | 16 | 12 (31) | 17 (44) | 10 (26) |
Cefoxitin | 16->256 | 32 | 256 | 2 (5) | 25 (64) | 12 (31) |
Ciprofloxacin | 2->16 | 16 | >16 | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | 38 (97) |
Moxifloxacinc | 1-32 | 8 | 8 | 9 (23) | 8 (21) | 22 (56) |
Gatifloxacinc | 1-16 | 8 | 16 | 8 (21) | 9 (23) | 22 (56) |
Levofloxacinc | 8->64 | 32 | 64 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 39 (100) |
Clarithromycin | 0.06->64 | 4 | >64 | 19 (49) | 1 (3) | 19 (49) |
Azithromycinc | 0.25->64 | >64 | >64 | 7 (18) | 5 (12) | 27 (70) |
Telithromycinc | 0.12->64 | 64 | >64 | — | — | — |
Doxycycline | 32->32 | >32 | >32 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 39 (100) |
Imipenemb | 2-64 | 16 | 64 | 7 (18) | 12 (31) | 20 (51) |
Meropenemc | 4-64 | 64 | >64 | 1 (3) | 2 (5) | 36 (92) |
TMP-SMZd | 64->64 | >64 | >64 | 0 (0) | — | 39 (100) |
Linezolide | 1-32 | 8 | 16 | 32 (82) | 5 (13) | 2 (5) |
M. abscessus (92) | ||||||
Amikacin | 1->128 | 8 | 8 | 88 (96) | 0 (0) | 4 (4) |
Tobramycina | 1->32 | 8 | 16 | 25 (27) | 39 (42) | 28 (30) |
Cefoxitin | 8-256 | 32 | 64 | 3 (3) | 85 (92) | 4 (4) |
Ciprofloxacin | 0.25->16 | 8 | 16 | 3 (3) | 2 (2) | 87 (95) |
Moxifloxacinc | 0.06-32 | 8 | 16 | 7 (8) | 10 (11) | 75 (82) |
Gatifloxacinc | 0.06-32 | 8 | 16 | 6 (7) | 16 (17) | 70 (76) |
Levofloxacinc | 0.5->64 | 16 | 64 | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 88 (96) |
Clarithromycin | 0.06->64 | 1 | 8 | 73 (79) | 9 (10) | 10 (11) |
Azithromycinc | 0.25->64 | 2 | 32 | 48 (52) | 0 (0) | 44 (48) |
Telithromycinc | 0.5->64 | 32 | >64 | — | — | — |
Doxycycline | 4->32 | >32 | >32 | 0 (0) | 7 (8) | 85 (92) |
Imipenemb | 1->64 | 8 | 16 | 11 (12) | 64 (70) | 17 (18) |
Meropenemc | 8->64 | 32 | 64 | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 9 (99) |
TMP-SMZd | 2->64 | >64 | >64 | 1 (1) | — | 91 (99) |
Linezolide | 1-32 | 16 | 32 | 29 (32) | 24 (26) | 39 (42) |
Tobramycin results were recommended to be reported only for M. chelonae isolates.
Imipenem results were not recommended to be reported for M. chelonae and M. abscessus isolates.
The breakpoints of these antimicrobial agents for RGM have not yet been addressed by the NCCLS (11). The NCCLS breakpoints for Staphylococcus species were used (12).
TMP-SMZ, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
The breakpoints of linezolid for RGM proposed by Wallace et al. (18) were used. These breakpoints of linezolid have not yet been addressed by the NCCLS (11).
—, no breakpoints are available.