Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 11;2:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-2-4

Table 5.

Qualitative uncertainty characterization for demand-side management health benefits model, focusing on key model assumptions.

Model Component Model Assumption Likely Magnitude of Uncertainty Effect of Alternative Assumptions
Energy model Insulation retrofits viable in 63% of homes, uniformly distributed nationally small -
Use of regression model to estimate REM/Design outputs small -
Calibration of regression model outputs to RECS data small -
Emissions reductions All marginal power plants equally likely to be affected by change in electricity consumption medium Capacity- or availability-based allocation (↑)
Use of AP-42 emissions data for residential fuel combustion medium -
Constant emissions from power plants and residential fuel combustion over time medium Emissions decrease over time given regulations (↓)
Focus on air emissions of PM, NOx, SO2 small Include other criteria pollutants, air toxics (↑)
Intake fractions Use of regression model estimates for intake fractions for power plants unknown -
Use of regression model estimates for primary PM intake fractions for residential combustion large Apply dispersion model with more refined spatial resolution (↑)
Use of regression model estimates for secondary PM intake fractions for residential combustion unknown -
Health evidence Use of American Cancer Society cohort evidence to estimate mortality risks from PM large Use results from Six Cities Study (↑); use only time-series evidence (↓)
Equal toxicity of all particles large -
Linear concentration-response function with no threshold unknown Assume threshold at PM2.5 annual NAAQS (↓)
Inclusion of only asthma attacks, restricted activity days for morbidity medium Incorporate other morbidity outcomes (↑)
Valuation Use of VSL of $6 million for mortality large -
Constant real price of fuel over time small -
Model framework Focus only on public health medium Include greenhouse gases, dependence on oil imports, etc. (↑)
Focus only on emissions reductions from energy savings medium Include emissions from insulation manufacturing, occupational risks, indoor air quality, etc. (↓)

Note: ↓ indicates that alternative assumption would likely reduce the net benefit estimate; ↑ indicates that alternative assumption would likely increase the net benefit estimate