Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 26;79(2):396–401. doi: 10.1086/506331

Table 3. .

Empirical Type I Error Rates at a Nominal .05 Significance Level for ASP Statistics under the Assumption of LE[Note]

Type I Error Rate for D′ =
Association Type
and Method
.0 .4 .8 1.0
minor0.1-minor0.1:
r2 .000 .160 .640 1.000
TASP .056 .133 .375 .554
 MLSASP .052 .171 .561 .796
Zlin-ASP .053 .127 .263 .542
minor0.3-minor0.3:
r2 .000 .160 .640 1.000
TASP .051 .162 .751 .978
 MLSASP .049 .185 .856 .996
Zlin-ASP .051 .160 .749 .978
minor0.5-minor0.5:
r2 .000 .160 .640 1.000
TASP .055 .149 .829 .996
 MLSASP .054 .159 .886 .999
Zlin-ASP .054 .147 .829 .996
minor0.1-major0.9:
r2 .000 .002 .008 .012
TASP .052 .050 .049 .047
 MLSASP .050 .044 .044 .042
Zlin-ASP .050 .047 .047 .046
minor0.3-major0.7:
r2 .000 .029 .118 .184
TASP .053 .057 .075 .096
 MLSASP .051 .056 .075 .098
Zlin-ASP .052 .056 .074 .095

Note.— The sample comprises 200 independent ASPs.