Skip to main content
. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1790–1793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1790

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Percent correct naming by 48 subjects participated in the second 4AFC experiment. After each trial in the first block, a 4AFC test was administrated. For images that could not be named when initially shown, accuracy on the subsequent 4AFC test was 31.6%. Images correctly named were always responded to correctly on the 4AFC test. Again, repeating the same image within the same quadrant improved identification markedly, whereas when objects were translated to a different quadrant naming accuracy was only slightly higher than that for control images in the second block. When we consider only the objects that were not identified correctly in block 1, the identification rates in the second block were 42.4% for the Within Quadrant condition, and 27.5% for the Between Quadrants condition. This replicates the results of experiment 1.