Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Dec 15;91(24):2087–2095. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.24.2087

Table 1.

Prevalence of 9p and 17p LOH in 60 patients with a maximum diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia*

No. with LOH/No. studied (% [95% CI])
60 total patients, any LOH on 9p or 17p 44/60 (73 [60% — 84%])
Patients informative for at least one locus
 Prevalence of 9p LOH 35/59 (59 [46%—72%])
 Prevalence of 17p LOH 34/57 (60 [46%—72%])
56 patients in whom both 9p and 17p loci could be evaluated
 Patients with neither 13/56 (23 [13%—36%])
 Patients with 9p LOH only 9/56 (16 [8%—28%])
 Patients with 17p LOH only 9/56 (16 [8%—28%])
 Patients with both 17p LOH and 9p LOH 25/56 (45 [31%—59%])
*

LOH = loss of heterozygosity; CI = confidence interval.