Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec 21;273(1588):865–874. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3327

Table 1.

Comparison of data and prediction by unlimited-capacity, parallel processing model. (The proportion correct and d′ value (in parentheses) obtained in experiment 1 (data), estimated values from a parallel processing model (model) and the results of paired t-test. **p<0.01, *p<0.05, p<0.10.)

n=2 n=4 n=8
data model paired t value (t(4)) data model paired t value (t(4)) data model paired t value (t(4))
flash-pip 5 s−1 0.970 0.988 2.72 0.749 0.964 8.20** 0.376 0.924 14.71**
(2.684) (3.050) (2.88*) (1.688) (3.304) (6.19**) (0.974) (3.454) (6.52**)
10 s−1 0.880 0.956 1.680 0.545 0.904 4.63** 0.291 0.827 5.81**
(1.764) (2.572) (1.780) (0.984) (2.712) (3.71*) (0.690) (2.764) (4.06*)
20 s−1 0.775 0.892 1.950 0.398 0.761 6.74** 0.208 0.601 4.18*
(1.162) (1.838) (1.910) (0.508) (1.820) (4.70**) (0.356) (1.770) (3.48*)
40 s−1 0.644 0.638 0.190 0.298 0.364 3.58* 0.169 0.189 0.790
(0.538) (0.502) (0.260) (0.170) (0.402) (3.64*) (0.224) (0.320) (0.870)
rotation-sweep 10 s−1 0.894 0.935 0.980 0.556 0.857 4.63** 0.290 0.747 5.30**
(0.386) (0.259) (0.670) (0.171) (0.361) (3.20*) (0.666) (2.362) (3.52*)