Skip to main content
. 2003 May 1;22(9):2104–2116. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg210

graphic file with name cdg210f1a.jpg

graphic file with name cdg210f1b.jpg

Fig. 1. Expression of HBx and HBx–GFP as functionally active forms. (A) Expression pattern of GFP and the HBx–GFP fusion protein. HepG2 cells were transfected with pEGFP and pEG-HBx-GFP plasmid. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were photographed by fluorescence microscopy (magnification ×200). (B) Expression of HBx and HBx–GFP analyzed by western blotting. HepG2 cells were transfected with pEG-HBx or pEG-HBx-GFP, and at 10 h post-transfection cells were treated with TNF-α for 20 h. Equal amounts of total cell lysates were analyzed by 12% SDS–PAGE. (C and D) Transcriptional transactivity of HBx and HBx–GFP in the CMV promoter-driven CAT reporter assay in HepG2 cells. At 24 h after co-transfection (0.5 µg each), whole-cell lysates were prepared and normalized for CAT assay with the calorimetric method (C) and TLC method (D).