Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;50(9):3154–3156. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-05

TABLE 1.

Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals of the fixed effects and goodness of fit for the two regimens from pooled and mixed-effects fits using the whole data set (SHT n = 54, SHRZ n = 46)

Regimen A (log10 CFU) α (log10 CFU/ml/day) B (log10 CFU) β (log10 CFU/ml/day) AICa LRb test
SHT
    Monoexponential 6.081 (5.851-6.311)c 0.102 (0.086-0.122) 769.4
    Biexponential 6.633 (6.282-6.984) 0.621 (0.241-1.132) 5.380 (4.916-5.844) 0.066 (0.045-0.099) 751.9 <0.0001
    Biexponential mixed effects 6.650 (6.264-7.037) 0.881 (0.651-1.191) 5.463 (5.114-5.812) 0.076 (0.060-0.095) 688.6 <0.001
SHRZ
    Monoexponential 6.397 (6.148-6.647) 0.146 (0.128-0.167) 622.2
    Biexponential 6.845 (6.509-7.180) 0.456 (0.243-0.858) 5.472 (4.868-6.075) 0.100 (0.072-0.140) 606.4 <0.0001
    Biexponential mixed effects 6.834 (6.509-7.159) 0.519 (0.409-0.658) 5.307 (4.824-5.790) 0.094 (0.079-0.113) 526.7 <0.001
a

AIC, Akaike information criterion.

b

LR, likelihood ratio.

c

Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.