Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Spinal Cord. 2005 Dec 13;44(9):547–559. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101862

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of rostrocaudal FOS+ neuronal distribution

Laminae
 IV, V, VII compared to
Segment level I – III IV, V, VII IX I – III IX
aRostral versus bCaudal 0.169 <0.0001 0.026
Within Rostral <0.0001 <0.0001
Within Caudral <0.0001 <0.0001
a

The rostral cord is designated here as T13–L2

b

caudal cord as L3–L6

Segments were compared using a mixed model using the least-square means adjusting for treadmill step duration with respect to the following groups of spinal cord laminae: dorsal horn (I–III), central canal region (medial IV, V, VII), and ventral horn (IX). The P-values were calculated to determine significant relationships of the pairwise comparisons