Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun;41(6):2596–2604. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2596-2604.2003

TABLE 2.

Differences in MICs for 44 isolates of B. hyodysenteriae tested in triplicate for comparisons of tests 2 and 3 with test 1

Antimicrobial agent MIC range tested (μg/ml) No. of MICsf
% of MICs within ±1 dilution
−2 −1 Same +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
Tiamulin 0.016-2 0 13 48 27 0 0 0 0 100
Tylosin 2-256 0 7 68a 13 0 0 0 0 100
Erythromycin 2-256 0 8 55b 15 7 2 0 1 89
Clindamycind 0.03-4 2 13 45c 24 2 0 0 0 95
Virginiamycin 0.25-16 3 12 54 19 0 0 0 0 97
Carbadoxe 0.004-0.5 6 15 25 21 9 1 1 0 78
a

For 19 isolates, MICs were outside the range of the panel in all three tests.

b

For 22 isolates, MICs were outside the range of the panel in all three tests.

c

For 11 isolates, MICs were outside the range of the panel in all three tests.

d

Forty-three isolates were compared (one isolate was excluded due to skipped wells).

e

Thirty-nine isolates were compared (five isolates were excluded due to skipped wells or contamination).

f

Values are numbers of MICs that were identical or differed within a range of −2 to +5 dilution steps.