TABLE 2.
Differences in MICs for 44 isolates of B. hyodysenteriae tested in triplicate for comparisons of tests 2 and 3 with test 1
| Antimicrobial agent | MIC range tested (μg/ml) | No. of MICsf
|
% of MICs within ±1 dilution | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | −1 | Same | +1 | +2 | +3 | +4 | +5 | |||
| Tiamulin | 0.016-2 | 0 | 13 | 48 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Tylosin | 2-256 | 0 | 7 | 68a | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Erythromycin | 2-256 | 0 | 8 | 55b | 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 89 |
| Clindamycind | 0.03-4 | 2 | 13 | 45c | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
| Virginiamycin | 0.25-16 | 3 | 12 | 54 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97 |
| Carbadoxe | 0.004-0.5 | 6 | 15 | 25 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 78 |
For 19 isolates, MICs were outside the range of the panel in all three tests.
For 22 isolates, MICs were outside the range of the panel in all three tests.
For 11 isolates, MICs were outside the range of the panel in all three tests.
Forty-three isolates were compared (one isolate was excluded due to skipped wells).
Thirty-nine isolates were compared (five isolates were excluded due to skipped wells or contamination).
Values are numbers of MICs that were identical or differed within a range of −2 to +5 dilution steps.