Table 4.
Estimated Differences in Adult Levels of BMI and Triceps Skinfold Thickness according to both Menarcheal Age and Childhood BMI
Whites (n = 771) | Blacks (n = 408) | |||
Comparison | Age Adjusteda | Fully Adjustedb | Age Adjusteda | Fully Adjustedb |
Early vs late Menarchec | ||||
Adult BMI (kg/m2) | 3.6** | 1.4* | 3.2* | 0.8 |
Adult triceps skinfold thickness (mm) | 4.2** | 1.9* | 4.8* | 2.2 |
Highest vs. lowest fourth of childhood BMId | ||||
Adult BMI (kg/m2) | 8.6** | 8.1** | 12.1** | 11.9** |
Adult triceps skinfold thickness (mm) | 9.8** | 9.0** | 13.4** | 12.9** |
a Age adjusted models for early vs late menarche control for childhood and adult ages; b Fully adjusted models for early vs late menarche control for childhood levels of BMI and triceps skinfold thickness (using linear and second-order terms), as well as for childhood and adult ages; c <12 y vs ≥ 13.5 y; d The proportion of children in each fourth of the BMI distribution are fairly similar to the proportion of girls with a menarcheal age <12 y (27%) and ≥ 13.5 y (28%). Fully adjusted models for childhood BMI controls for childhood and adult ages, and for menarcheal age. H0:As assessed in linear regression models, the estimated difference in adult BMI or triceps skinfold thickness is equal to 0 between women who experienced an early vs. late menarche, or who were relatively fat vs. thin in childhood. * p < 0.05; **p < 0.001