Abstract
Chloroform and other trihalomethanes are contaminants of drinking water that have been demonstrated to be carcinogenic in laboratory animals. Determination of the mechanism of carcinogenicity of chloroform is required so that the animal data can be extrapolated to estimate the human health hazard. The extent of the binding of chloroform to rat liver and kidney DNA was approximately 0.1% the level of binding found for dimethylnitrosamine. Neither chloroform nor bromoform, in contrast to diethylnitrosamine-initiated GGTase-positive foci in either intact or partial hepatectomized rats, promoted with phenobarbital. Tumor-promoting activity of chloroform was indicated by the slight significant increase, compared to untreated controls, in the incidence of GGTase-positive foci in rats initiated with diethylnitrosamine (DENA) followed by the administration of chloroform twice weekly for a total of 15 doses. In this study, rats administered only the DENA or the chloroform did not contain an increased incidence of GGTase-positive foci compared to untreated controls. However, the incidence of foci in the group that received DENA followed by chloroform was not statistically different from that in either the group that received only the DENA or only the chloroform. In conclusion, we were unable to demonstrate tumor-initiating activity for chloroform, and the tumor-promoting activity of chloroform indicated by our results requires further confirmation.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Boutwell R. K. The function and mechanism of promoters of carcinogenesis. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol. 1974 Jan;2(4):419–443. doi: 10.3109/10408447309025704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ford J. O., Pereira M. A. Short-term in vivo initiation/promotion bioassay for hepatocarcinogens. J Environ Pathol Toxicol. 1980 Nov;4(5-6):39–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KISSANE J. M., ROBINS E. The fluorometric measurement of deoxyribonucleic acid in animal tissues with special reference to the central nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1958 Jul;233(1):184–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klaassen C. D., Plaa G. L. Relative effects of various chlorinated hydrocarbons on liver and kidney function in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1966 Jul;9(1):139–151. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(66)90038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira M. A., Savage R. E., Jr, Herren S. L., Guion C. W. Comparison of enhancement of GGTase-positive foci and induction of ornithine decarboxylase in rat liver by barbiturates. Carcinogenesis. 1982;3(2):147–150. doi: 10.1093/carcin/3.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitot H. C., Sirica A. E. The stages of initiation and promotion in hepatocarcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 May 6;605(2):191–215. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(80)90004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rutenburg A. M., Kim H., Fischbein J. W., Hanker J. S., Wasserkrug H. L., Seligman A. M. Histochemical and ultrastructural demonstration of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity. J Histochem Cytochem. 1969 Aug;17(8):517–526. doi: 10.1177/17.8.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savage R. E., Jr, Westrich C., Guion C., Pereira M. A. Chloroform induction of ornithine decarboxylase activity in rats. Environ Health Perspect. 1982 Dec;46:157–162. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8246157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulte-Hermann R., Hoffman V., Parzefall W., Kallenbach M., Gerhardt A., Schuppler J. Adaptive responses of rat liver to the gestagen and anti-androgen cyproterone acetate and other inducers. II. Induction of growth. Chem Biol Interact. 1980 Sep;31(3):287–300. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(80)90017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]