Table 3.
Summary of development requirements for indicators of sustainable forest use.
| Form of indicator | Terms requiring definition | Methodological requirements | Survey requirements | Possible partners | Potential problems |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator 1: Area under sustainable forest management | |||||
| Either an indicator with a series of stages or a scoring system | ‘Sustainable management’ | Agreement on measuring levels of sustainability | Global surveys | ITTO, World Bank, CIFOR, certification bodies, wood product companies | Agreement on what constitutes sustainable |
| Indicator 2: Products from sustainably managed forests | |||||
| Volume or value of products | ‘Sustainably managed’ | Accounting methods | Existing surveys amalgamated into global figure | Certification bodies, major retailers, FAO | Agreement on what constitutes sustainable |
| Indicator 3: Area of natural forests | |||||
| Proportion of existing forest in natural state | ‘Natural’ | Rapid survey methods (ideally satellite images) in tropics | Data available for most temperate forests, still needed in tropics, Southern Arc and north Asia | FAO, UNECE, ITTO, NASA, World Resources Institute | Identifying natural forests; agreement on what is ‘natural’ in some areas |
| Indicator 4: Indicator species | |||||
| Status of key species reliant on sustainably managed forests | Identification of indicator species or surrogates | Survey methods exist | Major survey task unless data already collected for other indicators | National biodiversity surveys, Red List, NGOs, universities, research institutes | Costs of identifying and surveying relevant species may be prohibitive |