Table 1.
Key attributes of effective indicators of biodiversity.
| attribute | details |
|---|---|
| representative | includes all species in a chosen taxon, or a representative group. |
| immediate | capable of regular update, ideally, at least on an annual basis. |
| simplifying information | transparent, easy to interpret and visually attractive. Complex information must be presented simply to have impact and communicate. |
| easily understood | non-experts, from policy makers to members of the public, must be able to grasp the issues to have any ownership of them. |
| quantitative | accurate measurement with assessment of error. Shows trends over time, measures a rate of change and changes in the rate. |
| responsive to change | sensitive to environmental change over relatively short time-scales. |
| timeliness | allows rapid identification of trends—an early warning of issues. |
| susceptible to analysis | data can be disaggregated to help understand the underlying patterns and shed light on the potential causes of trends. |
| realistic to collect | quantitative data are available or can be collected readily. Does not require excessive or unrealistic financial resources. |
| indicative | representing more general components or attributes of biodiversity than just the constituent species trends, ideally reflecting ecosystem health. |
| user driven | developed in response to the need of stakeholders. |
| policy relevant | indicators aim to provide signals to policy customers to help them develop and then review policy measures. |
| stability | buffered from irregular, large natural fluctuations. |
| tractable | susceptible to human influence and change. |