Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):269–288. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1602

Table 2.

Assessing the soundness of indicators.

1. purpose what does the indicator aim to indicate?
is the aim described clearly?
is the aim to indicate changes in specific taxa only? Or is the aim to indicate change in biodiversity more generally, thus beyond its constituent parts?
is the aim to show how taxa or biodiversity responds to a particular environmental driver?
what spatial scale is the indicator designed for? Is the aim to indicate changes at a national scale, a regional scale or something else? Is the aim to indicate changes per ecosystem and which ecosystems are distinguished?
is the indicator intended to respond rapidly to environmental change? If not immediately, then on what time-scale?
who are the key stakeholders, policy- and decision-makers?
is the driver susceptible to human influence through policy or other measures?
can the indicator be disaggregated to shed light on the underlying ecological processes?
2. fit for purpose do sampling design and statistical method correspond to the purpose?
are the methods of species and sample site selection sound? Do they ensure representation of species groups, habitats or geographical areas? If not, can this be adjusted to reduce bias?
is the statistical analysis sound? Have missing values been taken into account? Are confidence limits around the indicator available? Failing this, can the sensitivity be measured in other ways?
if the purpose is to show changes in biodiversity more generally, how can this be substantiated?
if the purpose is to link changes with drivers, what is the evidence for this link? Is a positive change in the indicator associated with an improving or deteriorating situation for species/habitats in the environment? Could other environmental factors explain the behaviour of the indicator?
3. practicality can the indicator be constructed and updated easily?
does the indicator use existing data and expertise, or require new data collection and expertise?
is the indicator available immediately? If not, on what time-scale can it be produced?
can the indicator be updated frequently, e.g. annually, or less frequently?
what level of resource is required to produce the indicator? Is it cost-effective? Is further investment required and justified?