Table 5.
The nature of evidence showing concomitant declines of farmland biodiversity in the UK and in continental Europe.
| authors | type of study | taxa | nature of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donald (1998) | review | invertebrates & plants | significant change in populations with a preponderance of declines. Plant diversity, abundance and seed bank have declined. Trends in invertebrate populations have been stable, or have declined |
| Southerton & Self (2000) | review | plants & arthropods | increase and decline of species associated with farmland. Many arable plants have become rare, but some attained pest status. Many arthropods have declined |
| Benton et al. (2002) | correlation | arthopods & birds | Temporal links between the declines of farmland bird and invertebrate populations and changes in agricultural practices |
| Robinson & Sutherland (2002) | review | plants, invertebrates, vertebrates (reptiles, birds & mammals) | widespread decline in the populations of many groups of organisms associated with farmland. Marked loss of specialized taxa in favour of generalist species |
| Pitkänen & Tiainen (2001) | review of comprehensive monitoring | plants, birds, butterflies, bees & dung beetles | widespread declines in many taxa, loss of diversity and some extinction |
| Thomas et al. (2004) | comparison of changes in national geographical ranges | plants, birds & butterflies | 28% of plants, 54% of birds and 71% of butterflies had declined in range size |
| van Strien et al. (2004) | comparison of species trends in grassland | birds & butterflies | parallel declines of butterflies and birds |