Table 1.
senior author(s) location year(s) of article(s) | Gulf war veterans (GWV) | non-deployed veterans (NDV) or other comparison group(S) | results of neurological examinations | results of NCS and/or EMG | other types of neurological testing | neurological diagnoses, if any |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eisen & Kang National Survey in US 2000, 2004, 2005 | 1061 GWV | 1128 NDV | no difference between GWV and NDV on rates of peripheral neuropathy on neuro examinations | no difference between GWV and NDV on rates of peripheral neuropathy on NCS | — | rates of peripheral neuropathy were 4.8% in GWV and 5.9% in NDV |
Bourdette & McCauley Oregon and Washington 1999, 2001, 2002 | 241 ill GWV; 113 healthy GWV | — | no differences on neuro examinations between ill GWV and healthy GWV | some veterans had sensory symptoms that were not confirmed when tested with NCS | — | — |
Wessely & Sharief National survey in UK 1999, 2002, 2004 | 49 ill GWV; 26 healthy GWV | 13 ill Bosnia veterans; 22 ill NDV | neuro examinations were unremarkable in four groups of veterans | no evidence of peripheral neuropathy on NCS and EMG in four groups of veterans | ANS functionQSTQMmuscle biopsymuscle metabolism | Among four groups of veterans: eight cases of CTS and three cases of UN |
Kelsall & Sim National survey in Australia 2005 | 1382 GWV | 1376 NDV | no differences on neuro examinations between GWV and NDV | — | — | no differences in rates of four categories of disorders between GWV and NDV |
Fukuda 193rd Air National Guard in US 1995, 1998 | 99 ill GWV; 59 healthy GWV | — | no differences on neuro examinations between ill GWV and healthy GWV | — | — | — |
Haley 24th Seabees in US 1997, 2000, 2004 | 23 ill GWV; 10 healthy GWV | 10 healthy NDV | no differences on neuro examinations between ill GWV and controls | five ill GWV had NCS and EMG; four had mild abnormalities on NCS; all EMG were normal | ANS functionEPAV testing | — |
Jamal Glasgow, Scotland 1996 | 14 ill GWV | 13 healthy civilians | no differences on neuro examinations between GWV and controlsa | no differences on EMG between GWV and controls; no differences on NCS between GWV and controlsa | EPQST | — |
Newmark Seattle, Washington 1995 | 65 ill GWV | — | 58 out of 65 had normal neuro examinations | — | EEGsleep studies | among 65 GWV: 16 GWV were normal, 24 had headaches, 14 had sleep problems, one had CTS, one had UN, nine had other diagnoses |
Amato San Antonio, Texas 1997 | 20 ill GWV | — | all neuro examinations were normal, except for two cases of CTS | NCS were normal, except for two cases of CTS; EMG were normal | EEGCT scanmuscle biopsymuscle metabolism | two cases of CTS |
Rivera-Zayas San Juan, Puerto Rico 2001 | 12 ill GWV | — | all neuro examinations were normal | all NCS and EMG were normal | — | two cases of CTS |
Lee London, UK 2005 | 33 ill GWV | — | 26 out of 33 had normal neuro examinations | — | CT scan or MRIEEGbone scansX-rays of spine | among 33 GWV: 26 were normal, two had CTS, five had other diagnoses |
No differences, after adjustment for multiple statistical comparisons.